What is the difference between coaching and mentoring?

A mentor lends their own experience and tells you what they would do. A coach works on how you think and behave, using structure and evidence rather than their own career as the reference. Mentoring is valuable and cheaper; coaching is what you use when the issue is behavioural rather than informational.

How long does a coaching engagement run?

Most engagements run six to twelve sessions across several months, which is long enough for behaviour to change and be observed by others. We scope each one individually and set the re-measurement date at the outset rather than quoting a standard package.

Is coaching delivered online or in person?

Online, which means we coach leaders anywhere in Australia and New Zealand without travel cost or diary gymnastics. In-person sessions can be arranged where an engagement genuinely warrants it.

What does the sponsoring organisation see?

The agreed development priorities, a themes-level progress summary, and the re-measured result against baseline. The content of sessions and the leader's detailed diagnostic results stay with the leader. That boundary is set in writing before the work starts.

Which psychometric instruments do you use?

We select from validated instruments covering leadership behaviour, multi-rater feedback, reasoning and judgment, and personality and preference, matched to the role and the question being asked. We do not run a single proprietary tool on every leader regardless of the brief.

How do you show the coaching worked?

By running the same instrument at the close of the engagement that was run before the first session, and reporting the movement against it. That is the only honest answer to the question, and it is why the baseline is non-negotiable.

Free Organisational Health Check

Self-assessment of your organisation's health.Receive scored report at no cost, no obligation.Delivered by our sister company, Perceptn.

Service

Executive and leadership coaching

Coaching informed by validated diagnostics, so development targets evidence rather than impression.

What is executive and leadership coaching?

Executive coaching is a structured, confidential working relationship between a leader and a coach, directed at a defined set of behaviours the leader needs to change or strengthen. It is not therapy, it is not mentoring, and it is not advice about the leader's industry. The coach brings method and an outside view; the leader brings the work.

Leadership coaching applies the same discipline further down the organisation — emerging leaders, newly appointed managers and senior specialists moving into leadership for the first time. The mechanics are identical. What changes is the scope of the decisions being examined.

Why coaching without measurement drifts

Coaching is built on dialogue, which is its great strength and its hidden weakness. Without an external reference point, coach and coachee are working inside a shared bubble: the leader's self-perception is the primary data source, and the coach's pattern recognition is the primary instrument.

Three well-documented effects make that risky. Self-ratings of leadership behaviour agree only modestly with the ratings of peers, direct reports and managers. People least competent in a domain tend to overestimate themselves most severely. And coaches, like clinicians, are prone to confirmation bias and to over-applying whichever framework they trained in most recently. Measurement does not remove these problems; it introduces a second, independent source that both parties can interrogate.

The baseline test — can you state, in writing, what was true before the coaching started?
The other-perception test — does the agenda reflect how the leader is experienced, or only how they describe themselves?
The re-measure test — is there a date at which the same instrument will be run again?

What we measure before the first session

Each engagement opens with a diagnostic baseline drawn from validated instruments, chosen for the leader's role and the question the sponsor is trying to answer.

Leadership behaviour — what the leader does, described in observable terms rather than traits.
Multi-rater feedback — how the leader is experienced by the people above, beside and below them, and where that diverges from self-perception.
Reasoning and judgment — how the leader handles ambiguity, complexity and incomplete information.
Personality and preference — the dispositional pattern underneath the behaviour, including the strengths that become liabilities under pressure.

The measure, coach, re-measure loop

We run a simple and defensible sequence: baseline before the first session; a dedicated interpretation session where the leader reads their own data; goal contracting tied to that data and agreed with the sponsor; a programme of coaching sessions with the data revisited at agreed checkpoints; re-measurement at close against the original baseline; and a sustainment check some months later.

The evidence supports the discipline. Meta-analyses of organisational coaching report positive effects on performance, wellbeing, coping and self-regulation, with notably larger effects where the coaching incorporates multi-source feedback. The engagements reporting the strongest returns share one feature: structured measurement at the start and re-measurement at the end. Without it, return on investment is asserted. With it, it is evidenced.

Confidentiality, and what the sponsor sees

Coaching only works if the leader can be candid, so the content of sessions and the detail of the leader's diagnostic results are confidential to the leader. That is not negotiable, and an engagement that quietly reports the contents of the room back to the sponsor is not coaching.

What the sponsor receives is agreed in writing before the work begins: the development priorities, a themes-level progress summary, and the re-measured result against baseline. Everything the leader says stays with the leader. Everything the organisation is paying to change is visible.

The problem

Senior leaders receive less honest feedback the more senior they become. Coaching that runs on self-report and recollection becomes a useful conversation rather than a development process — the leader works on what they already knew about themselves, and the gap between intent and experienced behaviour stays invisible.

The organisational version of the same failure is a coaching spend nobody can account for. Several leaders are coached by several providers on several agendas, and when a board asks what it produced, the answer is a set of anecdotes.

The method

Coaching that starts with evidence. Each engagement opens with a diagnostic baseline drawn from a range of validated instruments — leadership behaviour, multi-rater feedback from the people who work above, beside and below the leader, reasoning and judgment, and personality and preference — so the coaching agenda is set by data rather than impression.

From there, a structured programme of coaching sessions over an agreed period, working on the specific behaviours the diagnostics identified. We re-measure at the close so progress is demonstrated, not asserted.

What you receive

A diagnostic baseline and a confidential debrief with the leader
Multi-rater feedback showing where self-perception and others' experience diverge
A written coaching plan with agreed development priorities and success measures
Scheduled one-to-one coaching sessions over the engagement period
A themes-level progress summary for the sponsor, without breaching the coaching confidence
A re-measure at completion against the original baseline

All diagnostics are confidential to the leader and conducted with informed consent. What the sponsor sees is agreed in advance.

Who this suits

Newly appointed executives, leaders stepping up a level, high-potential successors, and senior people whose results are strong but whose behavioural impact is costing the organisation.

The case for psychometrics in coaching

Our whitepaper on why validated measurement belongs at the centre of every coaching engagement: the evidence base, the common objections, and a practical measure-coach-re-measure framework.

Read the whitepaper

Common questions

What is the difference between coaching and mentoring?: A mentor lends their own experience and tells you what they would do. A coach works on how you think and behave, using structure and evidence rather than their own career as the reference. Mentoring is valuable and cheaper; coaching is what you use when the issue is behavioural rather than informational.
How long does a coaching engagement run?: Most engagements run six to twelve sessions across several months, which is long enough for behaviour to change and be observed by others. We scope each one individually and set the re-measurement date at the outset rather than quoting a standard package.
Is coaching delivered online or in person?: Online, which means we coach leaders anywhere in Australia and New Zealand without travel cost or diary gymnastics. In-person sessions can be arranged where an engagement genuinely warrants it.
What does the sponsoring organisation see?: The agreed development priorities, a themes-level progress summary, and the re-measured result against baseline. The content of sessions and the leader's detailed diagnostic results stay with the leader. That boundary is set in writing before the work starts.
Which psychometric instruments do you use?: We select from validated instruments covering leadership behaviour, multi-rater feedback, reasoning and judgment, and personality and preference, matched to the role and the question being asked. We do not run a single proprietary tool on every leader regardless of the brief.
How do you show the coaching worked?: By running the same instrument at the close of the engagement that was run before the first session, and reporting the movement against it. That is the only honest answer to the question, and it is why the baseline is non-negotiable.

Discuss an engagement

Most engagements begin with a short, confidential conversation about the question you are trying to answer. There is no cost or obligation attached to that discussion.

Make an enquiry